Relatives within the Woodland: The Struggle to Safeguard an Remote Amazon Group
The resident Tomas Anez Dos Santos toiled in a small clearing far in the of Peru Amazon when he detected footsteps approaching through the lush jungle.
He realized that he stood hemmed in, and stood still.
“A single individual stood, directing using an arrow,” he states. “Somehow he noticed of my presence and I commenced to run.”
He had come face to face the Mashco Piro. For decades, Tomas—dwelling in the modest community of Nueva Oceania—served as practically a local to these wandering people, who shun engagement with strangers.
An updated document issued by a rights organisation states there are at least 196 of what it calls “uncontacted groups” remaining in the world. This tribe is considered to be the largest. The study claims 50% of these communities might be eliminated in the next decade should administrations don't do more measures to safeguard them.
The report asserts the biggest risks come from deforestation, extraction or exploration for petroleum. Isolated tribes are exceptionally at risk to common disease—as such, the study states a risk is caused by interaction with religious missionaries and digital content creators in pursuit of clicks.
Recently, the Mashco Piro have been coming to Nueva Oceania increasingly, as reported by inhabitants.
This settlement is a fishermen's hamlet of several families, sitting elevated on the shores of the Tauhamanu waterway in the center of the Peruvian jungle, 10 hours from the most accessible town by canoe.
This region is not classified as a safeguarded zone for uncontacted groups, and timber firms operate here.
According to Tomas that, on occasion, the sound of logging machinery can be noticed day and night, and the Mashco Piro people are observing their forest damaged and ruined.
In Nueva Oceania, people report they are torn. They dread the Mashco Piro's arrows but they hold profound regard for their “relatives” dwelling in the jungle and want to protect them.
“Let them live in their own way, we can't modify their way of life. For this reason we maintain our separation,” explains Tomas.
Residents in Nueva Oceania are anxious about the harm to the community's way of life, the risk of conflict and the likelihood that loggers might subject the tribe to illnesses they have no immunity to.
During a visit in the community, the Mashco Piro made their presence felt again. Letitia Rodriguez Lopez, a resident with a toddler daughter, was in the jungle picking fruit when she heard them.
“There were calls, sounds from people, a large number of them. As though it was a crowd shouting,” she shared with us.
It was the first time she had met the tribe and she escaped. Subsequently, her mind was persistently throbbing from fear.
“As operate loggers and operations cutting down the forest they are fleeing, perhaps because of dread and they come in proximity to us,” she stated. “We are uncertain what their response may be with us. That is the thing that frightens me.”
In 2022, two loggers were attacked by the group while angling. One man was wounded by an bow to the stomach. He lived, but the other person was discovered lifeless subsequently with multiple puncture marks in his body.
The administration has a strategy of no engagement with secluded communities, making it forbidden to initiate interactions with them.
The policy originated in Brazil subsequent to prolonged of lobbying by community representatives, who saw that early contact with remote tribes could lead to entire communities being eliminated by sickness, hardship and hunger.
In the 1980s, when the Nahau people in Peru first encountered with the world outside, half of their people succumbed within a matter of years. During the 1990s, the Muruhanua tribe faced the same fate.
“Remote tribes are very susceptible—epidemiologically, any interaction may transmit diseases, and including the basic infections could eliminate them,” states an advocate from a local advocacy organization. “From a societal perspective, any contact or disruption may be highly damaging to their life and well-being as a group.”
For local residents of {